The same brand can be strong on one platform and absent on another.
Exterior Design was named and cited by Google AI for a combined exterior-services question while Gemini did not name it in the separately observed answer.
A field report from dated client observations and Tendou’s own visibility audit. It explains the patterns without presenting mixed questions as a league table.
On 27 September 2026, Tendou was named in zero of 30 completed answers from the locked ten-question Singapore panel: Google AI 0 of 10, Gemini 0 of 10 and Perplexity 0 of 10. ChatGPT was technically unstable, so those attempts remain unknown rather than absent.
The earlier 25 September panel was also zero of 18 usable answers. Both results remain published because a new page or submission is not an AI visibility win. View the full 32-question, 74-answer dataset and download the CSV ↗
On 9 November 2026, Tendou read its tendou.ai property for 11 October to 7 November in Google’s Generative AI performance report, Web (text). The property recorded 712 link impressions worldwide and 522 with Singapore selected. The worldwide total includes Singapore.
The specialty chemical suppliers guide had 130 Singapore page impressions. The Singapore agency page and the dedicated AEO agency page had no returned row in the Singapore page table. An omitted row leaves that page’s exposure unknown. The example shows why we check editorial guides and service pages separately. How we measure this.
Each observation records the exact question, platform and date. A visible owned-site link is required for “cited”. A business name without that link is “named”. Missing or blocked answers are “unknown”.
Different question cohorts are not combined into a before-and-after claim. The report describes what the captured answers showed at that time.
A website that needs work. Customers who can’t find you. A team running on spreadsheets and messages. Start there.